This site uses cookies from Google to deliver its services, to personalize ads and to analyze traffic. Information about your use of this site is shared with Google. By using this site, you agree to its use of cookies. Learn More

APPLE A8X VS TEGRA K1 VS SNAPDRAGON 801 - TABLET SOC COMPRARISON (2014 EDITION) 98331

In the last few years, ultra-mobile System-on-Chip processors have made unprecedented strides in terms of performance and efficiency, advancing very quickly the standards for mobile performance. One form factor that particularly benefits from the exponential growth of SoC performance are tablets, since their large screens allow for the processors' abilities to be fully utilized. For the holiday season of 2014, we have the latest and greatest of mobile performance shipping inside high-end tablets. Apple has made a whole new SoC just for their iPad Air 2 tablet, which they call the A8X. Nvidia's Tegra K1 processor, which borrows Nvidia's venerable Kepler GPU architecture, has also appeared on a number of new high-end tablets. Finally, we also have the Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 processor found in a few tablets, particularly from Sony. It's a shame that no tablet so far ships with Qualcomm's latest Snapdragon 805 SoC, and given that it's already appeared on a few smartphones and phablets, it's really disappointing to see it hasn't appeared on any tablet as of yet. In any case, the Snapdragon 801 is still a monstrous processor. But which one of these three processors is the best overall? To answer that, let's dive in to the specifications and performance data on each of these processors.

Apple A8X Nvidia Tegra K1 Snapdragon 801
Process Node 20nm 28nm HPM 28nm HPM
CPU Tri-core "Enhanced Cyclone" (64-bit) @ 1.5GHz 32-bit: Quad-core ARM Cortex A15 @ 2.3GHz
64-bit: Dual-core Denver @ 2.5GHZ
Quad-core Krait 400 @ 2.5GHz
GPU PoverVR GXA6850 @ 450MHz (230 GFLOPS) 192-core Kepler GPU @ 852MHz (327 GFLOPS) Adreno 330 @ 578GHz (166 GFLOPS)
Memory Interface 64-bit Dual-channel LPDDR3-1600 (25.6GB/s) 64-bit Dual-channel LPDDR3-1066 (17GB/s) 32-bit Dual-channel LPDDR3-1866 (14.9GB/s)


As you can see, on paper the Snapdragon 801 is the weakest SoC used in recent high-end tablets, but that's only because Qualcomm does have better SoCs available, but none of these have been used in a tablet yet. But to better compare these processors, we must turn to sinthetic benchmarks, evaluating these processors' overall performance.

Let's start with Geekbench 3.0, which evaluates the CPU both in terms of single-threaded performance and multi-threaded performance.
Apple A8X vs Tegra K1 vs Snapdragon 801 - Tablet SoC Comprarison (2014 Edition)
In single-threaded applications, Nvidia's custom Denver CPU core takes the first place, followed closely by Apple's enhanced Cyclone core on the Apple A8X. Meanwhile, the older Cortex-A15 and Krait 400 CPU cores are far behind, with the 2.2GHz A15 core in the 32-bit Tegra K1 pulling slightly ahead of the 2.3GHz Krait 400 core in the Snapdragon 801.
Apple A8X vs Tegra K1 vs Snapdragon 801 - Tablet SoC Comprarison (2014 Edition) In multi-threaded applications, where all of the CPU's cores can be used, the A8X, with its Triple-core configuration blows past the competition. The dual-core Denver version of the Tegra K1 gets about the same performance as the quad-core Cortex-A15 Tegra K1 variant, with the quad-core Krait 400 coming in last place.
Apple's addition of one extra core to the A8X's CPU, together with the fact that Cyclone is a very powerful core, make it easily the fastest CPU in the market for multi-threaded applications. While Nvidia's 64-bit Denver CPU core has some impressive performance, thanks to its wide core architecture, it's core count works against it in the multi-threaded benchmark. It is, in fact, the only dual-core CPU being compared here. Even if it's not as fast as the A8X's CPU, Nvidia's Denver CPU is a beast. Were it in a quad-core configuration, it would absolutely blow the competition out of the water. Moving away from CPU benchmarks, we shall now analyze graphics performance, which is probably even more important than CPU performance, given that it is practically a requirement for high-end tablets to act as a decent gaming machine. First we'll look at OpenGL ES 3.0 performance with GFXBench 3.0's Manhattan test, followed by the T-Rex test, which tests OpenGL ES 2.0 performance, followed by some of GFXBench 3.0's low level tests.
Apple A8X vs Tegra K1 vs Snapdragon 801 - Tablet SoC Comprarison (2014 Edition)
The Manhattan test puts the Apple A8X ahead of the competition, followed closely by both Tegra K1 variants, which have about the same performance, since they have the exact same GPU and clock speed. Unfortunately, the Adreno 330 in the Snpadragon 801 is not match for the A8X and the Tegra K1, something that points out the need for Qualcomm to get at least one OEM to ship a tablet with a Snapdragon 805, which has a much more competitive Adreno 420 GPU.
Apple A8X vs Tegra K1 vs Snapdragon 801 - Tablet SoC Comprarison (2014 Edition)
The T-Rex test paints a similar picture, with the A8X slightly ahead of the Tegra K1, while both of the Tegra K1 variants get about the same score, and the Snapdragon 801 falls behind the other two processors by a pretty big margin.

Apple A8X vs Tegra K1 vs Snapdragon 801 - Tablet SoC Comprarison (2014 Edition)
The Fill rate test stresses mostly the processor's memory interface and the GPUs ROPs (Render Output Units). Since both Apple and Nvidia have Dual-channel 64-bit DDR3 memory interfaces on their processors, they get very good scores on this test, with the A8X pulling ahead thanks to its higher memory clock compared to the Tegra K1. Meanwhile the Snapdragon 801, with a more basic 32-bit Dual-channel DDR3 memory interface, falls behind once again.
Apple A8X vs Tegra K1 vs Snapdragon 801 - Tablet SoC Comprarison (2014 Edition)
The ALU test is more about testing the GPUs sheer compute power. Since Nvidia's Tegra K1 has 192 CUDA cores on its GPU, it naturally takes the top spot here, and by a pretty significant margin.
For some reason, all tests show the 32-bit Tegra K1 in the Nvidia Shield Tablet scoring a few more points than the 64-bit Tegra K1 in the Google Nexus 9. But given that the two processors have the exact same GPU, this difference in performance is probably due to software tweaks in the Shield Tablet's operating system, which would make sense, given that it is more than anything a tablet for gaming.
Thermal Efficiency and Power Consumption
In the ultra-mobile space, power consumption and thermals are the biggest limiting factors for peformance. As the three processors being compared here are all performance beasts, several measures had to be taken so that they wouldn't drain a battery too fast or heat up too much.
In order to keep power consumption and die size in check, Apple has decided to shrink the manufacturing process from 28nm to 20nm, a first in the ultra-mobile processor market. That alone gives it a huge advantage over the competition, since they can put more transistors in the same die area, and with the same power consumption. Since the A8X is, in general, the fastest SoC available, the smaller process node is important to keep the iPad Air 2's battery life good.
Nvidia's Tegra K1 should also do well in terms of power consumption and thermal efficiency in situations where the GPU isn't pushed too hard. The 28nm HPM process it's built upon is nothing particularly good, but it's still not old for a 2014 processor. While the Kepler architecture is very power efficient, straining a 192-core GPU to its maximum is still going to produce a lot of heat in any case. The Nexus 9 tablet reportedly can get very warm on the back while the tablet is running an intensive game.
Finally, the Snapdragon 801, despite being older than the two aforementioned processors, should still be the less power hungry processor because it is also a smartphone processor. Given that a 5" phone can carry this processor without heating up too much or draining the battery too fast, a tablet should certainly be able to do the same. To put things in perspective, if we put the Tegra K1 or the Apple A8X inside a smartphone, both would be too power hungry and would produce too much heat to make for a decent phone. In any case, the Snapdragon 801 is, like the Tegra K1, built on a 28nm HPM process. Given that its not as much a performance moster as the other two processors mentioned here, it must be the least power hungry of all three.
Conclusion Objectively speaking, the comparisons made here make it pretty much clear that once again Apple takes the crown for the best SoC for this generation of high-end tablet processors. Not that the competition is bad. On the contrary, Nvidia went, in just one generation, from being almost irrelevant in the SoC market (let's face it, the Tegra 4 was not an impressive processor) to being at the heels of the current king of this market (aka Apple). The Tegra K1 is an excellent SoC, and even if it can't quite match the Apple A8X, it's still quite close to it in most aspects.
Meanwhile, Qualcomm is seeing it's dominance in the tablet market start to fail. It's latest SoC, the Snapdragon 805, available even on some smartphones and phablets, isn't on any tablet yet, which is a huge disappointment, given that a tablet can utilize the processing power more usefully than a smartphone or a phablet. However, a few tablets have the Snapdragon 801 and there are even some new tablets (for instance, Samsung's Galaxy Tab S line) shipping with the even older Snapdragon 800. The fact is that this is bad for Qualcomm, as anyone looking for a tablet with cutting-edge performance will probably look elsewhere. Either way, the Snapdragon 801, and for that matter the 800, is still a very good processor. It's just far from being the fastest.
Apple A8X vs Tegra K1 vs Snapdragon 801 - Tablet SoC Comprarison (2014 Edition) Apple a8x : nvidia tegra k1 : snapdragon 801 to be processor info for the upcoming htc nexus tablet cpuz reports are vs a500kl specs comparison Nivdia Tegra K1 vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 a retina display and the the Tegra K1 quad core SoC and on the other hand the tablet i got 55k Tegra K1 Apple A8X powered iPad When Nvidia announced its next generation mobile SoC, the Tegra K1, Qualcomm has announced the Snapdragon 810 SoC which is their

source : http://bbc.co.uk, http://kompas.com, http://tabshowdown.blogspot.com


0 Response to "APPLE A8X VS TEGRA K1 VS SNAPDRAGON 801 - TABLET SOC COMPRARISON (2014 EDITION) 98331"

Post a Comment

Contact

Name

Email *

Message *